By Inge Bartning, Maisa Martin, Ineke Vedder
The typical eu Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) has develop into the yardstick for instructing and trying out language talents in Europe and in other places. but little is understood in regards to the relationships among the communicative degrees tested utilizing the can-do statements of the CEFR and the developmental levels of grammatical and lexical improvement defined by means of moment Language Acquisition (SLA) examine. This ebook provides empirical examine by way of contributors of the SLATE community (Second Language Acquisition and trying out in Europe), aimed toward bridging this hole. The reviews care for numerous aim languages, together with Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Italian, Norwegian and Spanish, with grownup, adolescent and baby freshmen in either formal and casual contexts.
Read or Download Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research PDF
Similar schools & teaching books
This revised moment version bargains commonly with early early life curriculum layout and improvement, delivering particular how you can plan an emergency curriculum established upon built-in dynamic topics that develop out of kid's diversified own and cultural reports.
The earlier 20 years have obvious exponential progress of urbanisation and migration in China. rising from this progress are a myriad inhabitants of floating little ones and left-behind young ones and the ever better social-spatial interpenetration that areas those teenagers liable to bad well being. The residing and education of those little ones are fraught with potholes and distractions within the context of migration and urbanisation.
Additional info for Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research
Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. ), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 186–209). Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson Education. -Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity. Technical Report #17. University of Hawai’i: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Remember to begin and end the message appropriately. Write in English in clear characters in the space below. • Suggest a new time and place. • Explain why you can’t come.
Figure 2 shows how the L2 English and L2 Finnish task performances were rated. The box plots show the arithmetic means of ratings of L2 English and L2 Finnish performances and their variance across the five tasks. 36 Riikka Alanen, Ari Huhta and Mirja Tarnanen Figure 2. The ratings given for L2 English (on the left) and L2 Finnish (on the right) performances across the five tasks (T1-T5); dots represent outliers in the data set. ! B2 ! B2 ! B1 B1 A2 A2 A1 A1 ! ! ! ! T1 T2 T3 T4 L2 English T5 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 L2 Finnish Figure 3.
In J. C. Alderson & B. ), Language testing in the 1990s (pp. 71–86). London: Macmillan. Alderson, J. , & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing.